Method for aligning to vision (in Prioritization SS)
Clearly identify prioriti (in Prioritizat5ion SS)
Progress monitoring (in Project Management Plan)
Benchmarking process (in Project Management Plan)
Aligning to articulated goals (e.g., NEASC, School/District Improvement) (in Flow Chart)
Tech integration
Supported by Board policy (in Prioritization SS)
Method for articulation of current priorities (in Prioritization SS)
Communication/coordination with sending districts (in Project Management Plan)
Systematic analysis of data and communication tools/sources - separate spreadsheet
Lateral alignment with other departments’ goals/initiatives (in Prioritization SS)
Systematic identification of PD needs/priorities that are coordinated with PD Committee
Digital Learning Committee
Bruce talked about the focus of the Digital Learning Committee. This committee has been formed to get the people who are doing the most with technology together and have them talk about what they are doing, what they would like to do, what obstacles need to be overcome, etc. They are focusing on the instruction, using technology to engage learners and promote 21st Century learning.
Goal: To promote the use of technology to the greatest degree possible for teaching and learning
Lou envisions a chart that is topic-driven and includes:
Priorities
Policies
In Place
Needed
Implementation
Benchmarking
When
Who
PD Needed
Alignment to vision
Budget
Groups consulted
Lou asked that we not miss any topics/tools that are currently in use. He listed the following topics/tools:
MY Access
Naviance
Rubicon
PowerSchool
AlertNow
Limelight/Inform
Web sites/eBoards/Mobile apps
Once priorities are established and projects have been identified then there will be a need for a project management plan.
Questions:
How do we build into the process the commitment to complete the project?
How do we ensure that the process is objective and not affected by changes in personnel?
Decisions
We see this as a four step process:
Flow chart that determines whether a proposed project should be considered for implementation
Prioritization spreadsheet
Worksheet for Priority Projects in Progress
Individual Project Management Plans for long term projects that require timelines and benchmarks for progress monitoring. These will only be done for the items that are prioritized at a Level of 1 (it may include Priority Level 2, depending on available resources)
We need to build in a review of the process to ensure that everyone is on the same page and that there is consistency in implementing the process. It starts more frequently and goes to less frequent review as everyone gets comfortable with the process. If new personnel are hired, review may be more frequent again.
Process Input Issues
We discussed how to get input from stakeholders to ensure that their priorities are being considered. Periodically, a list of the highest priority projects would be shared with such groups as the PD Committee, Tech Coaches, the Digital Learning Committee, the general administrative team, the Department Heads, Student Congress, PTA, etc. They would be asked to use the rubric to provide input on their priorities for the identified projects on the list. The survey could be developed using an online tool like Survey Monkey or Zoomerang so the data could be collected and analyzed electronically.
Flow chart for Proposed Projects: Proposed Project Flow Chart 1-25-12.xlsx
Planning Notes in a Word document: Tech Planning Process Notes 1-25-12.docx
In attendance: Lou, Bruce, Jan, Jaime, Jane
Tech Planning Process
Digital Learning Committee
Bruce talked about the focus of the Digital Learning Committee. This committee has been formed to get the people who are doing the most with technology together and have them talk about what they are doing, what they would like to do, what obstacles need to be overcome, etc. They are focusing on the instruction, using technology to engage learners and promote 21st Century learning.
Goal: To promote the use of technology to the greatest degree possible for teaching and learning
Lou envisions a chart that is topic-driven and includes:
- Priorities
- Policies
- In Place
- Needed
- Implementation
- Benchmarking
- When
- Who
- PD Needed
- Alignment to vision
- Budget
- Groups consulted
Lou asked that we not miss any topics/tools that are currently in use. He listed the following topics/tools:Once priorities are established and projects have been identified then there will be a need for a project management plan.
Questions:
Decisions
We see this as a four step process:
We need to build in a review of the process to ensure that everyone is on the same page and that there is consistency in implementing the process. It starts more frequently and goes to less frequent review as everyone gets comfortable with the process. If new personnel are hired, review may be more frequent again.
Process Input Issues
We discussed how to get input from stakeholders to ensure that their priorities are being considered. Periodically, a list of the highest priority projects would be shared with such groups as the PD Committee, Tech Coaches, the Digital Learning Committee, the general administrative team, the Department Heads, Student Congress, PTA, etc. They would be asked to use the rubric to provide input on their priorities for the identified projects on the list. The survey could be developed using an online tool like Survey Monkey or Zoomerang so the data could be collected and analyzed electronically.